Month: April 2004

  •  


    15 YEARS AGO TODAY



    Apr 19 1989

    47 crewmen aboard the battleship USS Iowa are killed when a gun turret explodes during a training exercise in the Atlantic. Navy investigators later rule out all accidental causes, and conclude that someone manning the gun, “most probably” one Clayton Hartwig, had sabotaged its operation as a suicide attempt.


    The Navy ignored the fact that the propellant bags were 44 years old and proven to be chemically unstable.


    One of the incidents in the whole IOWA debacle was the rumor that there had been looting of the dead sailors’ lockers in the immediate timeframe after the explosion.”


    http://www.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?action=search&user=johnnyz


     

  •                 


    Textbook on Arabs removes blunder


    By George Archibald
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES

    An Indian tribe has forced distributors of an Arab studies guide for U.S. teachers to remove an inaccurate passage that says Muslim explorers preceded Christopher Columbus to North America and became Algonquin chiefs. 
        
        The 540-page Arab World Studies Notebook says the Muslim explorers married into the Algonquin tribe, resulting in 17th-century tribal chiefs named Abdul-Rahim and Abdallah Ibn Malik.


    The chapter written by Audrey Shabbas and Abdallah Hakim Quick claims that Muslims from Europe were the first to sail across the Atlantic and land in the New World, starting in 889.


     

  •  


                              


    Illinois National Guard recruit Sierra Donaldson, 17, brings up the rear as her unit arrives at the Army National Guard Complex in Marseilles, Ill., Donaldson joined dozens of other newly enlisted privates many of them high school juniors and seniors.


    From robx


     

  •  


                 


    Worker dies at plastics plant




    A West Side plastics recycling plant worker died after falling into a shredder while on the job Friday, Chicago Police said.


    The man, who was employed at Recycling Solutions Inc., 4525 W. Fifth, was putting plastic into the shredder about 1 p.m. when he leaned over to get everything out of the box and fell in.


     

  •  


    “At the Abyss: An Insider’s History of the Cold War” by Thomas Reed, a member of Ronald Reagan’s National Security Council, reveals that Reagan approved a CIA plan to sabotage the economy of the Soviet Union through covert transfers of technology that contained hidden malfunctions, including software that later triggered a huge explosion in a Siberian natural gas pipeline. Reed writes that the pipeline explosion was carried out “in order to disrupt the Soviet gas supply, its hard currency earnings from the West, and the internal Russian economy.”


    -Counterpunch


     

  •  


                                                       


    Peruvian Coca Growers Threaten National Strike as Deadline Looms 3/26/04


    Peruvian coca growers are less than a month away from unleashing a national strike if the government of President Alejandro Toledo does not begin to deal with their demands. 

    The strike call issued from the II Cocalero Conference held in Lima on February 18-20 and organized by the National Confederation of Coca Growers of Peru (CONPACCP), led by Nancy Obregon and Elsa Malpartida in the absence of Nelson Palomino, who has been jailed for more than a year in Ayacucho. Indeed, freedom for Palomino is one of their central demands of the government, along with:


    • suspension of coca eradication in all its forms, whether voluntary or not;
    • shutting down the Peruvian drug agency, DEVIDA, and expelling the non-governmental organizations that operated in its corrupt alternative development programs;
    • empowering coca growers to have a greater role in the governance of ENACO, the Peruvian state coca monopoly; and
    • promulgation of a new coca law that includes its industrialization and commercialization, and repeal of the existing coca law, Law 22095.

    CONPACCP gave the government 60 days to respond, and the clock is ticking toward the April 20 deadline.


     

  •  


                         


    FEATHERED FRIENDS
    by
    Dan Savage




    As an avid reader of your column, I thought of you and only you for help with this problem. My grandmother, 78 and widowed, is a kind, generous woman who has seen her share of difficult times. She is a bit offbeat, but extremely conservative and religious. After my grandfather passed on, she purchased a lively little parakeet and named him Pretty Baby. Pretty Baby has provided wonderful companionship and entertainment for my grandmother, even learning to speak to her. Pretty is an amazing mimic, repeating phrases she has taught him: “I love you,” “lock the door!”, “give me kisses,” etc.

    The problem is the kissing… or what I recently witnessed the kissing leads to. One evening Pretty began to squawk “give me kisses, give me kisses” and my grandmother walked over to the cage and slipped one finger between the bars. Pretty Baby proceeded to “kiss” her fingernail and flutter about. She purred, “Give Grandma lovin’, Pretty Baby, give Grandma lovin’.” She then turned to me and said, “Pretty Baby wants to give me lovin’ and he won’t quiet down until he does.” Pretty Baby proceeded to screech more and more loudly, as he humped my grandmother’s finger wildly. She also moved it back and forth for him. I was stunned and unsure of what was happening so I sat quietly in my chair looking in the opposite direction, hoping I wasn’t really witnessing what I thought I was. My grandmother cleared it up quickly, saying, “He’ll calm down after he climaxes,” smiling away and continuing to repeat, “Give me your lovin’, Pretty Baby, that’s it….” When Pretty Baby was finished, she looked back at me and said, “I better wash my hands!” I left minutes later, unable to process what had just happened. Grandmother, however, never flinched, acting like it was an everyday occurrence.

    I’m still horrified. Should I be concerned, Dan? About my grandmother? About Pretty Baby? Help!

    Polly Wanna Wanker


    I’ve been doing this job for a while now, PWW, and rarely do I get a question about a subject, sex act, position, kink, or bodily fluid that I’ve never had the pleasure of addressing before. But your question, PWW, is definitely a first. And a treat! A grandmother whacking off her pet parakeet? That’s the kind of question I live for! I almost hate to admit it–I mean, I don’t want you to think I’m as sick a fuck as your grandmother is–but I was thrilled to receive your letter. Thrilled!

    I was also suspicious. Could PWW be making this up? Did this grandma exist? Can you actually beat off a parakeet? Before I sought out some guest experts to address the whole beating-off-a-parakeet issue, I wrote back to PWW personally and demanded more background info. After speaking with PWW I can report that, yes, this grandmother exists, she owns a parakeet, and she’s one sick fuck.

    “Birds often begin to exhibit mating behavior when they reach sexual maturity,” said Pierre Brooks, who owns 33rd & Bird, a bird shop in New York City, and agreed to discuss this delicate issue with me. “For a singly-kept pet bird this can include attempts at mating with one of their toys or perches.” How about the little old lady that owns ‘em? “We have not come across an owner who becomes the bird’s surrogate mate, but it is not unrealistic.”

    But is it healthy? Is it good for the bird? Is it good for Grandma?

    “If this were one of our customers, we would advise the customer that the bird may be lonely and suggest introducing another parakeet for companionship. However this may not solve the problem. Birds are similar to humans: They are selective about their mates. Simply putting a male and female bird together does not guarantee that they will like one another, let alone breed.” And as much as you may want to tell your grandmother she’s a sick fuck and she’s got to stop beating off the bird, that might not be in the bird’s best interest. “A bird [can] feel lonely and sexually frustrated if its mate is taken away.” And like it or not, your grandmother is Pretty Baby’s mate.

    Seeking a second opinion, I spoke with Jesse B., who owns Ford’s Feathers in Torrance, California. “When it comes to a bird, they can be stimulated by any object. A toy, a perch. I haven’t heard of anyone masturbating their parakeet before.” Did he think it was wrong? “If she’s doing it because the bird wants it and she wants to make the bird feel better, that might be okay. But if she’s doing it for self-pleasure or because it excites her? Then she’s got a problem.”

    When it came to any long-term harm, Jesse agreed with Pierre. “It’s not going to hurt the bird. Or your grandmother. It’s good that the bird is male, though. You can induce the production of eggs in a female by stimulating her, and if they start releasing eggs, there’s always the risk of the bird becoming egg-bound, basically an egg stuck in the bird’s stomach, and that can kill the bird. But this is a male parakeet, so it’s not a problem.”

    Not a problem unless, of course, you’re the poor bastard who has to sit there and watch her widowed, kind, generous, conservative, religious grandmother finger-fuck her parakeet. That can’t be easy. But while I sympathize with your plight, PWW, I would urge you not to confront your dear ol’ gran. Even if she is “doing it for self-pleasure,” as Jesse worried she might be, she’s probably not long for this world and doesn’t have much in her life to distract her from impending death–why take this small pleasure, however sick and twisted, away from the old lady? Your grandma isn’t hurting the bird and she’s not hurting herself, and it’s not like she’s going to turn into a bird molester and start jumping on pigeons in parks. Why say anything that might make the old broad feel self-conscious about what she’s been up to with Pretty Baby?

    So keep your mouth shut, PWW, and just pray she doesn’t leave you that sicko bird in her will.


     

  •  


                          


     


    S.89
    Title: A bill to provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.
    Sponsor: Sen Hollings, Ernest F. [SC] (introduced 1/7/2003)      Cosponsors: (none)
    Related Bills: H.R.163
    Latest Major Action: 1/7/2003 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.


    http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:SN00089:


    **********************************************************


    H.R.163
    Title: To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons in the United States, including women, perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.
    Sponsor: Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] (introduced 1/7/2003)      Cosponsors: 13
    Related Bills: S.89
    Latest Major Action: 2/3/2003 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Executive Comment Requested from DOD.


    http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR00163:@@@L&summ2=m&


    From presidentgeorgewbush


  •  


    Bomb shell
    The mine would be kept warm by chickens

     


    Plans to fill a nuclear landmine with chickens to regulate its temperature were seriously considered during the Cold War.


    The Army planned to detonate the seven-tonne device on the German plains in the event of having to retreat.

    But nuclear physicists at the Aldermaston nuclear research station in Berkshire were worried about how to keep the landmine at the correct temperature when buried underground.

    In a 1957 document they proposed live chickens would generate enough heat to ensure the bomb worked when buried for a week.

    The birds would be put inside the casing of the bomb, given seed to keep them alive and stopped from pecking at the wiring.


     

  •  


    * In a December profile, the Washington Post examined the breezy American history curriculum being sold to schools by Presidential brother Neil Bush (more in the news lately for his messy divorce).


    The course’s premise is that future “hunter-gatherers” (i.e., rambunctious boys) don’t have the patience to read and should be taught by music, graphics, and other techniques.  For instance, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 is taught in a rap song, “It was 55 delegates from 12 states / Took one hot Philadelphia summer to create / A perfect document for their imperfect times / Franklin, Madison, Washington   a lot of the cats / Who used to be in the Continental Congress way back.”


    -News of the Weird