August 23, 2004

•  

  
  

  

  
  

  Justice Department Using Pre-Written Op-Eds to Shill for Mandatory Minimums 8/20/04

  
  

  In response to increasing pressures to undo the harsh mandatory minimum prison sentences that have made the US the world's incarceration leader and the federal prison system the fastest growing in the country, the US Justice Department under Attorney General John Ashcroft is striking back.
  

  The Justice counteroffensive is centered on an op-ed piece supporting mandatory minimums written at Main Justice in Washington but being pitched to newspapers across the country under the signature of local US Attorneys. The "astroturfing," or attempting to fake a grassroots upswelling of support for mandatory minimums, was first unearthed by Families Against Mandatory Minimums (http://www.famm.org) and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (http://www.criminaljustice.org) last week.
  

  The op-eds extol the virtues of mandatory minimums and warn that the Supreme Court's Blakely decision, which held that juries, not judges, must find facts that lead to longer sentences, jeopardizes "the safety of America." According to NACDL, the same op-ed has appeared in at least three separate newspapers across the country under the names of three different, local US Attorneys. The News Republic this week found the op-ed published in three Tennessee newspapers alone, under the names of two different US Attorneys.

  
  

   

  • 6:57 pm
  • 1 Comment